Banglalink vs Cirkle: Which Rebrand Did It Better

 Banglalink vs Cirkle: Which Rebrand Did It Better

Bangladesh's telecom landscape has recently seen two major brand transformations.

In 2025, Banglalink introduced a new identity after nearly two decades of its familiar visual language. In August 2026, Airtel was replaced by Cirkle, bringing an end to Airtel's 16-year journey as a consumer brand in Bangladesh.

Both brands are trying to move beyond traditional telecom. But they have taken very different approaches.

So rather than asking which logo looks better, let's look at what each rebrand is actually doing.

2025

Banglalink

New identity after nearly 20 years of familiar visual language

Aug 2026

Cirkle

Replaces Airtel after 16 years as a consumer brand in Bangladesh

01

Visual Identity: Familiarity vs Freshness

Banglalink

Familiarity, refreshed

Banglalink's biggest visual decision was moving away from the identity people had known for almost 20 years.

The change makes the brand feel more contemporary and digital-first. But changing a highly recognizable identity comes with a cost: customers may like the new look while still feeling more connected to the old one.

Cirkle

Freshness, reinvented

Cirkle takes a completely different approach. The name, identity and visual language are built around the idea of circles and connection.

The result feels younger and more community-oriented, which fits the audience Airtel traditionally targeted.

Banglalink's visual change feels like evolution. Cirkle's feels like reinvention.

02

Branding: What Does the Brand Want to Be?

This is where the two approaches become particularly interesting.

Banglalink

Banglalink is trying to expand its role from a telecom operator into a broader digital lifestyle brand, supported by services such as MyBL and Toffee.

Cirkle

Cirkle is building its identity around young people's digital circles—friends, communities, gaming, entertainment and content creation.

Both are moving beyond connectivity, but their territories are different.

Banglalink is essentially saying

“We are becoming more than a telecom company.”

Cirkle is saying

“We are about the people and communities you connect with.”

03

Storytelling: Which Has More to Say?

A strong brand needs an idea that can generate stories.

Banglalink

Banglalink's story is centred around transformation, progress, digital experiences and a more customer-focused future.

Cirkle

Cirkle has a simpler emotional starting point: connection. A circle can represent a group of friends, an online community, a gaming squad or a creator's audience. That gives Cirkle plenty of room to build campaigns around real relationships and shared experiences.

04

Customer Reaction: The Hardest Test

This may ultimately be the most important difference.

Banglalink

Banglalink's rebrand asks existing customers to accept a significantly different visual identity while remaining the same brand.

Will customers recognize the new Banglalink as the same brand they already know?

Cirkle

Cirkle asks Airtel customers to accept an entirely new name. That makes Cirkle's transition particularly interesting.

The practical side of the change has been kept relatively simple: existing customers retain their 016 numbers, packages, balances and services.

But emotional acceptance is harder to measure.

Will people actually stop saying “Airtel” and start saying “Cirkle”?

That may take much longer to answer.

05

Which Rebrand Feels More Future-Ready?

Both brands understand that telecom is changing.

People no longer see their mobile operator only as the company providing calls and data. Telecom brands are increasingly competing for a place in people's entertainment, communication and digital lives.

Banglalink's response

Building a wider digital ecosystem.

Cirkle's response

Focusing on communities, entertainment, creators and digital connection.

Neither approach is necessarily better. They are simply solving different branding problems.

The Bigger Picture

It's not about which logo won

The interesting thing about these two rebrands isn't deciding which logo is better.

It's seeing how two established telecom brands are trying to escape the traditional “mobile operator” category.

  • Banglalink is refreshing a familiar brand and giving it a broader digital role.
  • Cirkle is taking the equity of a youth-focused brand and rebuilding it around a new idea of connection.

And that leaves us with a more interesting question than “Who won?”

“Which brand will people actually feel connected to five years from now?”

That's something neither a new logo nor a launch campaign can answer.
Only the customers can.

Found this helpful?

Share it with your network

LinkedIn

Build a brand customers stay connected to

From loyalty programs to customer insights, Quickly's CRM tools help restaurants and retailers turn everyday interactions into lasting relationships.

Explore restaurant CRM